Textus Magistri
Book I: On the Mystery of the Trinity · Proemium
The numbered footnotes below correspond to markers in both the Latin body above and the English translation; Quaracchi restart their numbering on every printed page, so the labels are qualified by page.
PROLOGUS MAGISTRI
IN LIBROS SENTENTIARUM1
Cupientes aliquid de penuria ac tenuitate nostra cum paupercula in gazophylacium Domini mittere2, ardua scandere, opus ultra vires nostras agere praesumsimus, consummationis fiduciam laborisque mercedem in Samaritano3 statuentes, qui, prolatis in curationem semivivi duobus denariis, supereroganti cuncta reddere professus est. Delectat nos veritas pollicentis, sed terret immensitas laboris: desiderium hortatur proficiendi, sed dehortatur infirmitas deficiendi, quam vincit zelus domus Dei. «Quo4 inardescentes, fidem nostram adversus errores carnalium atque animalium hominum» Davidicae turris clypeis munire vel potius munitam ostendere ac theologicarum inquisitionum abdita aperire nec non et sacramentorum ecclesiasticorum pro modico5 intelligentiae nostrae notitiam tradere studuimus, «non valentes studiosorum fratrum votis iure resistere, eorum in Christo laudabilibus studiis lingua ac stilo nos servire flagitantium, quas bigas in nobis agitat Christi caritas6».
«Qnamvis7 non ambigamus, omnem humani eloquii sermonem calumniae atque contradictioni aemulorum semper fuisse obnoxium, quia, dissentientibus voluntatum motibus, dissentiens quoque fit animorum sensus», «ut, cum omne dictum veri ratione perfectum sit, tamen, dum aliud aliis aut videtur aut complacet, veritati vel non intellectae vel offendenti8 impietatis error obnitatur, ac voluntatis invidia resultet», «quam Deus huius saeculi operatur in illis diffidentiae filiis9, qui non rationi voluntatem subiiciunt nec doctrinae studium impendunt, sed his quae somniarunt sapientiae verba coaptare nituntur, non veri, sed placiti rationem sectantes, quos iniqua voluntas non ad intelligentiam
veritatis, sed ad defensionem1 placentium incitat, non desiderantes doceri veritatem, sed ab ea ad fabulas convertentes auditum2. Quorum professio est magis placita quam docenda conquirere nec docenda desiderare, sed desideratis doctrinam coaptare. Habent rationem sapientiae in superstitione3: quia fidei defectionem sequitur hypocrisis mendax, ut sit vel4 in verbis pietas, quam amiserit conscientia, ipsamque simulatam pietatem omni5 verborum mendacio impiam reddunt, falsae doctrinae institutis fidei sanctitatem corrumpere molientes auriumque pruriginem sub novello sui desiderii dogmate aliis ingerentes, qui contentioni studentes contra veritatem sine foedere bellant». «Inter veri namque assertionem et placiti defensionem pertinax pugna est, dum se et6 veritas tenet, et se voluntas erroris tuetur». Horum igitur et7 Deo odibilem ecclesiam evertere atque ora oppilare, ne virus nequitiae in alios effundere queant, et lucernam veritatis in candelabro exaltare volentes8, in labore multo ac sudore hoc volumen, Deo praestante, compegimus ex testimoniis veritatis in aeternum fundatis, in quatuor libros distinctum.
In quo maiorum exempla doctrinamque reperies9, in quo per dominicae fidei sinceram professionem vipereae doctrinae fraudulentiam prodidimus, aditum demonstrandae veritatis complexi nec periculo impiae professionis inserti10, temperato inter utrumque moderamine utentes. Sicubi vero parum vox nostra insonuit11, non a paternis discessit limitibus. «Non igitur debet hic labor cuiquam pigro vel multum docto videri superfluus, cum multis impigris multisque indoctis, inter quos etiam mihi, sit necessarius12», brevi volumine complicans Patrum sententias, appositis eorum testimoniis, ut non sit necesse quaerenti librorum numerositatem evolvere, cui brevitas collecta13 quod quaeritur offert sine labore. «In hoc autem tractatu non solum pium lectorem, sed etiam liberum correctorem desidero, maxime ubi profunda versatur veritatis quaestio, quae utinam tot haberet inventores, quot habet contradictores14». Ut autem quod quaeritur facilius occurrat, titulos, quibus singulorum librorum capitula distinguuntur, praemisimus.
Explicit prologus.
---
THE MASTER'S PROLOGUE
TO THE BOOKS OF SENTENCES1
Desiring to cast something out of our own poverty and slenderness, together with the poor widow, into the Lord's treasury2, to climb steep places, we have presumed to undertake a work beyond our strength, placing the confidence of its completion and the wage of our labour in the Samaritan3, who, when two denarii had been brought out for the healing of the half-dead man, promised to repay in full whatever should be spent beyond them. The truth of him who promises delights us, but the immensity of the labour affrights us: the desire of making progress exhorts us, but the weakness of falling short dissuades us — a weakness which zeal for the house of God overcomes. «Burning with which4, we have striven to fortify our faith against the errors of carnal and animal men» with the shields of the tower of David, or rather to show it already fortified, and to open the hidden things of theological inquiries, and likewise to hand on a knowledge of the sacraments of the Church according to the little measure5 of our understanding, «not being able rightly to resist the desires of studious brethren, who demand that we serve their praiseworthy studies in Christ with tongue and pen, which two horses the charity of Christ drives in us6».
«Although7 we do not doubt that every discourse of human speech has always been liable to the calumny and contradiction of rivals, since, when the motions of wills disagree, the sense of minds also comes to disagree», «so that, although every saying is perfect by the account of truth, yet, while one thing seems or pleases to some and another to others, the error of impiety strives against a truth either not understood or giving offence8, and the envy of the will rebounds», «which the god of this world works in those sons of diffidence9, who do not subject their will to reason nor spend study upon doctrine, but strive to fit the words of wisdom to the things they have dreamed, following the account not of the true but of the pleasing, whom an iniquitous will incites not to the understanding
of truth, but to the defence1 of the things that please them, not desiring to be taught the truth, but turning their hearing away from it to fables2. Their profession is to seek out what pleases rather than what is to be taught, and not to desire the things to be taught, but to fit doctrine to the things desired. They have an account of wisdom in superstition3: because a lying hypocrisy follows upon the failure of faith, so that there may be at least4 in words the piety which conscience has lost; and that very simulated piety they render impious by every5 mendacity of words, contriving to corrupt the sanctity of faith by the institutes of false doctrine, and thrusting upon others an itching of the ears under the new-fangled dogma of their own desire — men who, being zealous for contention, war against the truth without a treaty». «For between the assertion of the true and the defence of the pleasing there is a stubborn battle, so long as both6 truth holds its own and the will guards its error». Wishing therefore both7 to overturn the church of these men, hateful to God, and to stop their mouths, lest they be able to pour out the poison of their wickedness upon others, and to lift up the lamp of truth upon the lampstand8, we have with much toil and sweat, God granting it, put together this volume out of the testimonies of truth founded unto eternity, divided into four books.
In it you will find9 the examples and the teaching of our forebears; in it, through a sincere profession of the Lord's faith, we have exposed the fraudulence of viperine doctrine, having embraced the approach of demonstrating the truth, yet not entangled10 in the peril of impious profession, using a moderation tempered between the two. But if anywhere our own voice has sounded too little11, it has not departed from the paternal boundaries. «This labour, then, ought not to seem superfluous to anyone lazy or very learned, since it is necessary to many who are not lazy and to many unlearned, among whom I too am12» — gathering into a short volume the sentences of the Fathers, with their testimonies set alongside, so that it need not be necessary for one who seeks to unroll a multitude of books, since the brevity here collected13 offers without labour what is sought. «But in this treatise I desire not only a devout reader, but also a free corrector, especially where a deep question of truth is handled, which — would that it had as many discoverers as it has contradictors14». And that what is sought may come to hand the more easily, we have prefixed the titles by which the chapters of the several books are distinguished.
Here ends the prologue.
---
- 1Editiones et codices, quos contulimus, aut omittunt hanc epigraphem, aut varie exhibent; cumque non sibi constent, nihil est cur in ea aliquid immutemus. Editores Vaticani, editionem 2 secuti, hunc prologum in tres partes diviserunt, singulas singulis titulis distinguentes, at contra fidem omnium codicum nec non aliarum editionum, quorum auctoritate divisionem sustulimus, titulis contractis et in marginem reiectis. Ipse S. Bonaventura in Commentario hunc prologum in duas partes principales dispertit in margine notatas.The editions and codices which we have collated either omit this heading or give it in varying forms; and since they are not consistent among themselves, there is no reason why we should alter anything in it. The Vatican editors, following edition 2, divided this prologue into three parts, distinguishing each by its own title, but against the witness of all the codices and of the other editions as well, on whose authority we have removed the division, the titles being contracted and thrown out into the margin. St. Bonaventure himself, in his Commentary, distributes this prologue into two principal parts, noted in the margin.
- 2Respicitur illud Luc. 21, 2; et Marc. 12, 42. — Mox post verbum scandere in sola ed. 8 additur coniunctio et.Reference is made to that passage of Luc. 21, 2; and Marc. 12, 42. — Presently, after the word scandere, the conjunction et is added in ed. 8 alone.
- 3Alluditur ad Luc. 10, 35.An allusion is made to Luc. 10, 35.
- 4Haec verba, paucis mutatis vel transpositis a Magistro, ita leguntur apud August. III. de Trin. n. 1: «Pro studio, quo fidem nostram adversus errorem carnalium et animalium hominum muniri inardesco, necesse est me pati». Omnes codd. et edd. cum. Vat. legunt atque pro et. Errorem vero pro errores habet cum Augustino etiam ed. 2, quam tamen, contradicentibus omnibus codd. ceterisque edd., sequi non licet, cum perfamiliare fuerit Magistro verba, quae aliunde accipit, in usum suum mutare, ea per varios casus inflectendo, transponendo et minuendo, vel de suo alia interponendo et addendo. Quod non semel lectoribus observandi occasionem dabimus.These words, with a few things changed or transposed by the Master, are read thus in August., de Trin. III, n. 1: «For the zeal with which I burn that our faith be fortified against the error of carnal and animal men, I must needs suffer». All the codices and editions, with the Vatican, read atque for et. Ed. 2 also has errorem for errores, with Augustine; which nevertheless, since all the codices and the remaining editions contradict it, may not be followed, since it was very familiar to the Master to change to his own use the words which he takes from elsewhere, inflecting them through various cases, transposing and shortening them, or interposing and adding others of his own. Of which we shall more than once give readers occasion to observe.
- 5Cod B cum omnibus edd. legit pro modulo, refragantibus Codd. A C D E cum aliis plurimis, quos Florentiae et Pataviae consuluimus. In cod. D manus altera saeculi XV. scripsit ad marginem pro modulo: glossema, quod forte in aliis mss. a margine in textum irrepsit et inde in editis obtinuit.Codex B, with all the editions, reads pro modulo, against Codices A C D E with very many others which we consulted at Florence and at Padua. In codex D a second hand of the fifteenth century wrote in the margin pro modulo: a gloss which perhaps in other manuscripts crept from the margin into the text, and thence prevailed in the printed editions.
- 6August. loc. cit. «... fratribus autem non valeam resistere, iure, quo eis servus factus sum, flagitantibus, ut eorum in Christo laudabilibus studiis lingua ac stilo meo, quas bigas in me caritas agitat, maxime serviam».Augustine, in the place cited. «... but I cannot resist the brethren, who demand, by the right whereby I have been made their servant, that I serve to the utmost their praiseworthy studies in Christ with my tongue and pen, which two horses charity drives in me».
- 7Hilar. de Trin. libr. x. n. 1: «Non est ambiguum, omnem humani eloquii sermonem contradictioni obnoxium semper fuisse: quia dissentientibus voluntatum motibus, dissentiens quoque fit sensus animorum; cum adversantium affectione compugnans, assertionibus his, quibus offenditur, contradicit. Quamvis enim omne dictum veri ratione perfectum sit, tamen, dum aliud aliis aut videtur, aut complacet, patet veritatis sermo adversantium responsioni: quia contra veritatem aut non intellectam aut offendentem vel stultae vel vitiosae voluntatis error obnititur. Immoderata enim est omnis susceptarum voluntatum pertinacia; et indeflexo motu adversandi studium persistit, ubi non rationi voluntas subiicitur nec studium doctrinae impenditur, sed his quae volumus rationem conquirimus, et his quae studemus doctrinam coaptamus. Iamque nominis potius quam naturae erit doctrina, quae fingitur: et non iam veri manebit ratio, sed placiti, quam sibi voluntas magis ad defensionem placentium coaptaverit, non quae voluntatis instinctum per intelligentiam veri rationabilis incitabit». Dein post verba placentium incitat, totidem omissis quot attulit, sequentia usque ad foedere bellant ex eodem Hilario ibidem n. 2. passim excerpsit Magister. Tum ad Hilar. n. 1. rediens, ut pauca illa: Inter veri namque usque tuetur, accipiat, ubique pro more suo etiam in iis, quae accipit, aliquid demit, mutat interpolatque.Hilary, de Trin. bk. x, n. 1: «It is not doubtful that every discourse of human speech has always been liable to contradiction: because, when the motions of wills disagree, the sense of minds also comes to disagree; and, fighting against the affection of opponents, it contradicts those assertions by which it is offended. For although every saying is perfect by the account of truth, yet, while one thing seems or pleases to some and another to others, the word of truth lies open to the answering of opponents: because against a truth either not understood or giving offence there strives the error of a will either foolish or vicious. For all obstinacy of wills once taken up is immoderate; and with an unbending motion the zeal of opposing persists, where the will is not subjected to reason nor is study spent upon doctrine, but we hunt up a reason for the things we wish, and fit doctrine to the things we pursue. And thereupon the doctrine which is feigned will be one of name rather than of nature: and there will no longer remain an account of the true, but of the pleasing, which the will has rather fitted to the defence of the things that please it, and not one which will rouse the will's instinct through the understanding of what is truly reasonable». Then, after the words placentium incitat, omitting as many as he had adduced, the Master excerpted here and there what follows, down to foedere bellant, from the same Hilary, ibid. n. 2. Then, returning to Hilary n. 1, in order to take up those few words Inter veri namque down to tuetur, everywhere after his manner — even in what he takes — he removes, changes, and interpolates something.
- 8Vat. male et contra codd. et fere omnes edd. addit et ante impietatis, et mox legit obnititur et resultat.The Vatican edition wrongly, and against the codices and nearly all the editions, adds et before impietatis, and presently reads obnititur and resultat.
- 9II. Cor. 4, 4. et Eph. 2, 2. — Vat. saeculi huius pro huius saeculi, sed renitentibus omnibus mss. cum edd. 1, 8 atque ipso sacro textu, et mox post filiis adiungit suis contra codd. et edd. omnes et ipsam Vulgatam, ubi legitur: operatur in filios diffidentiae.II Cor. 4, 4 and Eph. 2, 2. — The Vatican edition has saeculi huius for huius saeculi, but with all the manuscripts resisting, together with editions 1 and 8 and the sacred text itself; and presently, after filiis, it adds suis, against all the codices and editions and the Vulgate itself, where it reads: operatur in filios diffidentiae.
- 1Solus cod. E hic addit sibi.Codex E alone here adds sibi.
- 2II. Tim. 4, 4.II Tim. 4, 4.
- 3Coloss. 2, 23; Vulgata: Quae sunt rationem quidem habentia in superstitione. Ceterae edd. et omnes codd. relativum quae supprimunt eiusque loco punctum ferunt post coaptare, dum Vat. et ed. 4 legunt coaptare, quae habent.Coloss. 2, 23; the Vulgate: Quae sunt rationem quidem habentia in superstitione. The remaining editions and all the codices suppress the relative quae and in its place put a full stop after coaptare, while the Vatican edition and ed. 4 read coaptare, quae habent.
- 4Vat. omittit vel, quod restituimus ex Hilario, ex omnibus codd. et edd., excepta 4. Mox pro amiserit legitur amisit in cod. D et amiserat in ed. 2. Utrumque respuunt cum Hilario ceteri codd. et edd.The Vatican edition omits vel, which we have restored from Hilary, from all the codices and editions, edition 4 excepted. Presently, for amiserit, amisit is read in codex D and amiserat in ed. 2. The remaining codices and editions, with Hilary, reject both.
- 5Codd. A B E et edd. 1, 8 male omnium pro omni.Codices A B E and editions 1 and 8 wrongly have omnium for omni.
- 6Codd. D E hic male praetermittunt particulam et.Codices D E here wrongly pass over the particle et.
- 7Solus cod. D cum edd. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 omittit et. Utraque lectio bona, sed facilior sine et.Codex D alone, with editions 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, omits et. Either reading is good, but the easier is without et.
- 8Respicitur Matth. 5, 15. — Mox deest hoc in codd. A B C et in edd. 1, 8. Deinde codd. D F et quatuor libris pro in quatuor libris.Reference is made to Matth. 5, 15. — Presently hoc is wanting in codices A B C and in editions 1 and 8. Then codices D F have et quatuor libris for in quatuor libris.
- 9Cod. E invenies.Codex E has invenies.
- 10Solummodo Vat. et ed. 4 incerti pro inserti.Only the Vatican edition and ed. 4 have incerti for inserti.
- 11Edd. 2, 9, 10 insonuerit. Tum cod. B bene post non adiungit tamen; deinde cod. A liminibus pro limitibus.Editions 2, 9, 10 have insonuerit. Then codex B rightly adds tamen after non; then codex A has liminibus for limitibus.
- 12Ex August. de Trin. III. n. 1, quibusdam omissis et nonnullis additis; in quo textu superflue et contra originale codd. A B D E cum edd. 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 post etiam addunt et.From August., de Trin. III, n. 1, some things being omitted and several added; in which text codices A B D E, with editions 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, superfluously and against the original add et after etiam.
- 13In Vat. ac edd. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 nec non cod. A desideratur collecta. Paulo ante legitur revolvere pro evolvere in ed. 1.In the Vatican edition and editions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and likewise in codex A, collecta is wanting. A little before, revolvere is read for evolvere in ed. 1.
- 14Paulo aliter apud August. ibid. n. 2, cuius integer locus, cum sit brevis, describitur: Sane cum in omnibus litteris meis non solum pium lectorem, sed etiam liberum correctorem desiderem, multo maxime in his, ubi ipsa magnitudo quaestionis, utinam tam multos inventores habere posset, quam multos contradictores habet.Somewhat differently in August., ibid. n. 2, whose whole passage, since it is short, is here set down: Indeed, since in all my writings I desire not only a devout reader but also a free corrector, much most of all in these, where the very magnitude of the question — would that it could have as many discoverers as it has contradictors. ---