Dist. 37, Divisio Textus
Book IV: On the Sacraments · Distinction 37
COMMENTARIUS IN DISTINCTIONEM XXXVII.
De impedimentis iuris ecclesiastici, quae sunt ordo et crimen.
Sunt igitur quidam ordines, in quibus nullatenus etc.
DIVISIO TEXTUS.
Haec est pars, in qua Magister principaliter determinat de his quae matrimonium impediunt simpliciter. Et habet haec pars duas, quia tale impedimentum duplex est: quoddam, quod simpliciter impedit cum omni; quoddam, quod cum quodam sic, cum quodam non: ideo secundum hoc haec pars habet duas. In prima parte determinat de his quae simpliciter impediunt et cum omni. In secunda de his quae cum aliquibus sic, cum aliquibus non, infra distinctione trigesima nona: Post haec de dispari cultu etc.
Prima pars habet duas. In prima parte agit de impedimento, quod impedit propter ecclesiasticam institutionem. In secunda de eo quod impedit propter propriam obligationem, infra distinctione trigesima octava: Nunc de voto inspiciamus etc.
Et quoniam ecclesiastica institutio quosdam excludit a matrimonio propter excellentiam vitae, ut clericos; quosdam propter enormitatem culpae, ut uxoricidas: ideo haec pars habet duas particulas. In prima determinat de impedimento ordinis. In secunda de impedimento criminis, ibi: His adiiciendum est de occisoribus suarum coniugum etc. Utraque pars remanet indivisa propter brevitatem.
TRACTATIO QUAESTIONUM.
Ad intelligentiam huius brevis distinctionis secundum duo, quae in ea tanguntur, duo hic principaliter quaeruntur.
Primo quaeritur de ordinis impedimento.
Secundo de uxoricidio.
Circa primum quaeruntur tria. Primum est, utrum ordines minores impediant matrimonium. Secundo, utrum ordines sacri. Tertio quaeritur quantum ad ecclesiasticum statutum, per quod sacri ordines impediant matrimonium.
ARTICULUS I.
De impedimento ordinis.
---
COMMENTARY ON DISTINCTION XXXVII.
On the impediments of ecclesiastical law, which are order and crime.
There are, therefore, certain orders, in which by no means etc.
DIVISION OF THE TEXT.
This is the part in which the Master principally determines concerning those things which impede matrimony absolutely (simpliciter). And this part has two [subdivisions], because such an impediment is twofold: one which absolutely impedes with everyone (cum omni); another which [impedes] with a certain [person] thus, with a certain [person] not: therefore according to this, this part has two [subdivisions]. In the first part he determines concerning those things which impede absolutely and with everyone. In the second, concerning those which [impede] with some thus, with some not, below in the thirty-ninth distinction: After these things, concerning disparity of worship etc.
The first part has two [subdivisions]. In the first part he treats of the impediment which impedes on account of ecclesiastical institution. In the second, of that which impedes on account of a proper obligation, below in the thirty-eighth distinction: Now let us examine concerning the vow etc.
And since ecclesiastical institution excludes some from matrimony on account of excellence of life, such as clerics; some on account of the enormity of guilt, such as wife-slayers (uxoricidas): therefore this part has two little parts (particulas). In the first he determines concerning the impediment of order. In the second concerning the impediment of crime, there: To these must be added [something] concerning the slayers of their own spouses etc. Each part remains undivided on account of brevity.
TREATMENT OF THE QUESTIONS.
For the understanding of this brief distinction, according to the two [things] which are touched upon in it, two [matters] are here principally asked.
First it is asked concerning the impediment of order.
Second, concerning wife-murder (uxoricidium).
Concerning the first, three [things] are asked. The first is, whether minor orders impede matrimony. Second, whether sacred orders [do]. Third it is asked, as regards the ecclesiastical statute, through which sacred orders impede matrimony.
ARTICLE I.
On the impediment of order.
---