Bonaventure

The numbered footnotes below correspond to markers in both the Latin body above and the English translation, and render the Quaracchi NOTAE AD COMMENTARIUM for this distinction.

## COMMENTARIUS IN DISTINCTIONEM XLIII.

De resurrectione secundum id quod est.

Postremo de conditione resurrectionis et modo resurgentium etc.

DIVISIO TEXTUS.

Terminata parte principali huius libri, in qua Magister determinavit de sanitate, quam Sacramentorum medicamenta conferunt; sequitur pars, in qua agit de sanitate, ad quam Sacramenta disponunt¹. Prima est sanitas gratuita, secunda est gloriosa; prima est viae, secunda patriae; prima est a culpa, secunda a miseria. Et quoniam ad hanc gloriam habendam concurrit resurrectio, et concurrit iudicium; ideo primo determinat de resurrectione, secundo vero de iudicio, infra quadragesima septima distinctione: Solet etiam quaeri, qualiter dabitur sententia iudicii.

Prima pars habet duas. Quoniam enim in resurrectione anima separata reiungitur corpori; ideo primo agit de resurrectione, secundo vero de statu animae separatae, infra distinctione quadragesima quinta: Praeterea sciendum est, quod omnes animae etc. Prima pars habet duas. In prima determinat de resurrectione, secundum id quod est. In secunda, quantum ad modum sive quantum ad qualitatem et quidditatem resurgentium, infra distinctione quadragesima quarta: Solent autem nonnulli percontari etc.

Prima pars habet duas. In prima procedit per modum narrationis. In secunda per modum inquisitionis, ibi: Hic quaeritur, utrum electis tunc adsit etc. — Prima pars habet tres partes. In prima parte ostendit, resurrectionem esse futuram. In secunda vero determinat resurrectionis causam, ibi: Causa enim resurrectionis mortuorum etc. In tertia determinat resurrectionis horam, ibi: Media autem nocte dicitur venturus; ubi dicitur, quod dicit² resurrectionem futuram media nocte, non propter temporis qualitatem, sed potius propter horae incertitudinem.

Hic quaeritur, utrum electis tunc adsit etc. Haec est secunda pars, in qua procedit Magister per modum inquisitionis, determinans dubitabilia, quae habent ortum ex praedictis; illa autem dubia sunt quatuor, quae habent ortum ex verbis Apostoli, quae prius tacta sunt; et ideo pars ista habet quatuor particulas et quatuor capitula, in quibus illa dubia determinat. In primo quaerit de librorum apertione, et quae ibi leguntur et quae ad memoriam reducuntur³. In secundo quaerit de vivorum inventione, ibi: Quaeri etiam solet, utrum illi quos vivos etc. In tertio vero determinat, quomodo intelligitur, quod iudicabit vivos et mortuos, ibi: His autem adiiciendum est. In quarto, quomodo intelligitur illud, quod mortui resurgent incorrupti, ibi: Cumque ex praedictis sane credi valeat etc.

TRACTATIO QUAESTIONUM.

Ad intelligentiam eorum quae determinat Magister, duo principaliter quaeruntur circa praesentem distinctionem.

Primo quaeritur de resurrectione.

Secundo de librorum apertione.

Quantum ad primum quaeruntur sex.

Primo quaeritur, an resurrectio sit futura.

Secundo, dato quod sic, quaeritur, utrum resurrectio sit omnium.

Tertio, dato quod sit omnium, quaeritur, utrum sit omnium simul, an successive.

Quarto quaeritur, utrum resurrectio sit eorundem secundum numerum.

Quinto, utrum resurrectio sit naturalis, vel miraculosa.

Sexto quaeritur de causa nostrae resurrectionis.

---

## COMMENTARY ON DISTINCTION XLIII.

On the resurrection according to that which it is.

Lastly, concerning the condition of the resurrection and the manner of those rising, etc.

DIVISION OF THE TEXT.

The principal part of this book having been concluded, in which the Master determined concerning the health which the medicaments of the Sacraments confer, there follows the part in which he treats of the health to which the Sacraments dispose¹. The first is gratuitous health, the second is glorious; the first is of the way, the second of the fatherland; the first is from fault, the second from misery. And since resurrection concurs, and judgment concurs, to the having of this glory; therefore he first determines concerning the resurrection, and second concerning the judgment, below in the forty-seventh distinction: It is also wont to be asked, in what manner the sentence of judgment will be given.

The first part has two [members]. For since in the resurrection the separated soul is rejoined to the body, therefore he first treats of the resurrection, and second of the state of the separated soul, below in the forty-fifth distinction: Moreover it must be known that all souls etc. The first part has two [members]. In the first he determines concerning the resurrection, according to that which it is. In the second, as regards the manner, or as regards the quality and quiddity of those rising, below in the forty-fourth distinction: But some are wont to inquire etc.

The first part has two [members]. In the first he proceeds by way of narration. In the second by way of inquiry, there: Here it is asked, whether the elect are then present etc. — The first part has three parts. In the first part he shows that the resurrection will be. In the second he determines the cause of the resurrection, there: For the cause of the resurrection of the dead etc. In the third he determines the hour of the resurrection, there: But at midnight he is said to be coming; where it is said, that he says² the resurrection will be at midnight, not on account of the quality of the time, but rather on account of the uncertainty of the hour.

Here it is asked, whether the elect are then present etc. This is the second part, in which the Master proceeds by way of inquiry, determining the doubtful matters which have their origin from the aforesaid; and those doubts are four, which have their origin from the words of the Apostle, which were touched upon before; and therefore this part has four particles and four chapters, in which it determines those doubts. In the first he asks concerning the opening of the books, and the things which are there read and the things which are recalled to memory³. In the second he asks concerning the finding of the living, there: It is also wont to be asked, whether those whom [we shall find] living etc. In the third he determines how it is understood, that he will judge the living and the dead, there: But to these it must be added. In the fourth, how that is understood, that the dead will rise incorrupt, there: And since from the aforesaid it may soundly be believed etc.

TREATMENT OF THE QUESTIONS.

For the understanding of the things which the Master determines, two things are principally asked concerning the present distinction.

First it is asked concerning the resurrection.

Second, concerning the opening of the books.

As regards the first, six things are asked.

First it is asked, whether the resurrection will be.

Second, granted that it will, it is asked, whether the resurrection is of all.

Third, granted that it is of all, it is asked, whether it is of all at once, or successively.

Fourth it is asked, whether the resurrection is of the same [bodies] according to number.

Fifth, whether the resurrection is natural, or miraculous.

Sixth it is asked, concerning the cause of our resurrection.

---