← Back to Capitulum X

Cap. 10, Vers. 4-7

Commentarius in Ecclesiasten · Capitulum X

Textus Latinus
English Translation

p. 80Si spiritus potestatem habentis. Praemissa est supra sapientis despectio et econtra ipsius iusta commendatio; subiungitur hic tertio stultorum promotio. Et quia praelatio stultorum est onerosa, ideo praemittitur patientiae armatura, et subiungitur stultorum praelatio inordinata, ibi: Est malum, quod vidi etc.

(Vers. 4.). Praemittitur ergo patientiae armatura, propter quam habendam dicit: Si spiritus potestatem habentis, id est furor praelati; spiritus enim furor dicitur Isaiae secundo10: « Quiescite ab homine, cuius spiritus in naribus eius »; tertii Regum decimo nono: « Spiritus grandis et fortis, subvertens montes et conterens » etc. Ascenderit super te, ad opprimendum scilicet; Ieremiae quarto: « Ecce, quasi nubes ascendet, et quasi tempestas currus eius; vae nobis, quoniam vastati sumus ». Locum tuum ne dimiseris, id est locum patientiae et constantiae, in quo anima conquiescit, secundum illud Lucae vigesimo primo11: « In patientia vestra p. 81 possidebitis animas vestras »; primae Petri secundo: « Servi, subditi estote in omni timore dominis vestris, non tantum modestis, sed et discolis; haec est enim gratia, si propter conscientiam Dei sustinet quis » etc. Et redditur ratio utilitatis: Quia curatio faciet cessare peccata maxima. Vocatur hic curatio flagellorum afflictio, in quibus homo curatur; Sapientiae sexto1: « Cura disciplinae est dilectio, et dilectio est custoditio legum ». Causalis est utrobique praedicatio, quia, si per multa flagella pervenitur ad dilectionem, et per hanc custoditur lex; ergo cessare facit peccata.

Aliter exponitur: Si spiritus potestatem habentis, id est, si spiritus ambitionis, id est malitia ambitiosi, ascenderit super te, id est, si venerit tibi in mentem, ut velis esse praelatus; locum tuum ne dimiseris, locum scilicet subiectionis et servitutis, de quo Lucae decimo quarto2: « Cum invitatus fueris ad nuptias, recumbe in novissimo loco »; et Ecclesiastici undecimo: « Confide autem in Deo, et mane in loco tuo ». Et ratio redditur: Quia curatio faciet cessare peccata maxima. Translatio Symmachi habet3: Quia pudicitia; unde primae ad Corinthios nono: « Castigo corpus meum et in servitutem redigo, ne forte, cum aliis praedicavero, ipse reprobus efficiar ».

Aliter exponitur de diabolo: Si spiritus potestatem habentis, id est diaboli; Iob penultimo4: « Non est potestas super terram, quae possit ei comparari »; ascenderit super te, et hoc tentando; Lucae undecimo: « Cum immundus spiritus exierit ab homine, ambulat per loca inaquosa, quaerens requiem, et non invenit ». Locum tuum ne dimiseris, locum scilicet poenitentiae; ad Ephesios quarto: « Nolite locum dare diabolo ». Quia curatio cessare faciet peccata maxima; littera Origenis5 habet: salvatio, quae quidem est per medicinam poenitentiae; Ecclesiastici undecimo: « Malitia unius horae oblivionem facit luxuriae maximae », id est brevis poenitentia magni peccati.

(Vers. 5.). Est malum, quod vidi etc. Tangitur hic secundum, scilicet stultorum praelatio inordinata, tum propter defectum scientiae, tum propter defectum vitae, quia stulti et mali praeficiuntur, sed sapientes et divites bonis moribus deprimuntur. Propter quod dicit: Est malum, quod vidi sub sole, id est in praesenti statu hominum, quasi per errorem egrediens, non per errorem secundum veritatem, sed apparenter per errorem, sed tamen secundum iustam discussionem; a facie principis, illius scilicet, a quo est omnis potestas, qui iusto iudicio dat aliquando malos praelatos; Osee decimo tertio6: « Dabo tibi regem in furore meo, et auferam in indignatione mea ».

(Vers. 6.). Et exprimit, quod est illud malum quantum ad defectum scientiae: Positum stultum in dignitate sublimi; positum, bene dicit, quia non est ibi nisi falsa positio; Psalmus7: « Posuisti eis, deiecisti eos, dum allevarentur ». Vel: positum tanquam lapidem inutilem; unde Zachariae undecimo dicitur stulto praelato: « O pastor et idolum! derelinquens gregem, gladius super brachium eius et super oculum dexterum eius; brachium eius ariditate siccabitur, et oculus dexter eius tenebrescens obscurabitur »; et ideo Proverbiorum vigesimo sexto: « Sicut qui mittit lapidem in acervum mercurii, ita qui tribuit insipienti honorem ». Econtra: Divites sedere deorsum; divites, scilicet bonis moribus et scientia et gratia, de quibus primae ad Corinthios primo8: « In omnibus divites facti estis in illo, ut nihil vobis desit in ulla gratia »; et Isaiae trigesimo tertio: « Divitiae salutis sapientia et scientia ».

(Vers. 7.). Quantum ad vitae defectum dicit: Vidi servos in equis; servos dicit peccatores, de quibus Ioannis octavo9: « Qui facit peccatum servus est peccati »; in equis, pluraliter dicit ad expressionem pompae; Deuteronomii decimo septimo: « Cum fuerit constitutus, non multiplicabit sibi equos ». E contra: Principes ambulantes quasi servos, illos scilicet principes, qui sibi per bonam vitam principantur; Seneca: « Si bene te rexeris, princeps eris »; istos vidit quasi servos, sed in futuro erit e contrario; Lucae decimo quarto: « Omnis, qui se humiliat, exaltabitur, et qui se exaltat humiliabitur ».

Quaestio.

Quaeritur hic, utrum iustum sit, quod mali praesint bonis. Quod sic, videtur:

p. 82 1. Quia dicitur ad Romanos decimo tertio1: Non est potestas nisi a Deo: ergo mali principes non habent potestatem nisi a Deo.

2. Item, Ioannis decimo nono2: Non haberes, ait Christus Pilato, potestatem adversus me ullam, nisi desuper tibi datum esset. Et exponit Augustinus desuper: id est a Deo: ergo si Pilatus malus erat et male utebatur potestate, ergo quod mali praesint, hoc est a Deo.

3. Item, primae Petri secundo3: Subditi estote non tantum bonis et modestis, sed etiam discolis; et reddit rationem: propter conscientiam: ergo si iustum est eis subesse, cum omne iustum sit a Deo, hoc etiam ab ipso erit.

4. Item, Iob trigesimo quarto4: Qui facit regnare hypocritam propter peccata populi etc.: ergo etc.

Contra: 1. Osee octavo5: Ipsi regnaverunt et non ex me; principes exstiterunt, et ego non cognovi: ergo videtur, quod praelatio malorum non sit a Deo.

2. Item, servitus est poena inflicta pro peccato6, ergo nulli recte et iuste infligitur nisi peccatori: ergo ab oppositis, nec dominium iuste datur nisi iusto. Ergo si dominium datur peccatori, et servitus iusto; est ibi defectus ordinis et iustitiae: ergo non est a Deo.

3. Praeterea, si potestas malorum est iusta et a Deo, quia a Deo nihil est nisi iustum; cum nullus debeat alicui auferre ius suum7: ergo nullus debet laborare ad depositionem mali praelati: ergo quicumque laborat, contra hoc peccat.

Respondeo: dicendum, quod malus vel iniustus praelatus est sub triplici differentia. Quidam est iniustus in se, tamen iuste ingreditur et iuste exsequitur; et talis iuste8 praeesse potest nec in hoc peccat, et iustum est tali subesse. Est et alius, qui iniuste ingreditur et exsequitur; et talis non potest iuste praeesse, nec tali debet homo subesse. Est et alius, qui iniustus est, sed tamen iuste ingreditur, sed iniuste exsequitur, quia affligit bonos et promovet malos; tali iustum est subesse in his quae spectant ad iustitiam; sed in his quae contra Deum sunt, non debet homo subesse; et « quia privilegium meretur amittere qui concessa sibi abutitur potestate9 », etsi iuste ingressus fuerit; tamen iustum est, eum amoveri.

Quod ergo obiicitur ad primam partem, utrum malos praeesse sit iustum; dicendum, quod malos, qui bene regunt, praeesse, non est malum reipublicae; sed qui male regunt iustum est praeesse, non sua iustitia, sed divina, quia facit eum regnare propter peccata populi10. — Et sic patet responsio ad prima obiecta, quod malorum hominum potestas a Deo est.

1. Quod obiicit in contrarium primo, dico, quod intelligit quantum ad eos qui intrant illegitime et propria auctoritate, non divina.

2. Quod obiicit de ordine, dico, quod poena peccati manet etiam sine peccato ad exercitationem; sic etiam dico de servitute in bonis.

3. Quod obiicit: si a Deo, ergo iustum est, istum habere talem potestatem; dicendum, quod per comparationem ad merita sua non est iustum, immo iniquum; comparatione ad merita malorum subditorum est iustum. Et quia ex diversis causis licitum est nobis velle contraria, ubi non patet divina voluntas; et nescimus, quid horum de futuro magis placeat Deo: iuste potest homo laborare, ut iniustus praelatus amoveatur. — Praeterea, talem potestatem habuit a Deo, sed exsecutionem a se; potestatem habuit iuste, sed exsequitur iniuste: et ideo quamdiu a Deo habet potestatem, est obediendum; sed quia iniuste exsequitur, ut non habeat, est laborandum. Sic patet illud11.

---

p. 80If the spirit of him that hath power. Above was set forth the despising of the wise man and, on the other hand, his just commendation; here is added, thirdly, the promotion of fools. And because the prelacy of fools is burdensome, therefore the armour of patience is set first, and the disordered prelacy of fools is added, at: There is an evil that I have seen etc.

(Vers. 4.). First, then, the armour of patience is set forth, for the having of which he says: If the spirit of him that hath power, that is, the fury of the prelate; for fury is called spirit in Isaias, the second10: « Cease ye from the man, whose spirit is in his nostrils »; of the third of Kings, the nineteenth: « A great and strong spirit, overthrowing the mountains and breaking » etc. Ascend upon thee, namely to oppress; Jeremias, the fourth: « Behold, he shall come up as clouds, and his chariots as a tempest; woe unto us, for we are laid waste ». Leave not thy place, that is, the place of patience and constancy, in which the soul rests, according to that of Luke, the twenty-first11: « In your patience p. 81 you shall possess your souls »; the first of Peter, the second: « Servants, be subject in all fear to your masters, not only to the modest, but also to the froward; for this is grace, if for conscience towards God a man endure » etc. And the reason of the usefulness is given: Because care will make the greatest sins to cease. Here the affliction of scourges, in which a man is cured, is called care; Wisdom, the sixth1: « The care of discipline is love, and love is the keeping of laws ». The predication is causal in both places, since, if through many scourges one comes to love, by this too the law is kept; therefore it makes sins to cease.

It is expounded otherwise: If the spirit of him that hath power, that is, if the spirit of ambition, that is, the malice of the ambitious man, ascend upon thee, that is, if it come into your mind that you would be a prelate; leave not thy place, the place, namely, of subjection and servitude, of which Luke, the fourteenth2: « When thou art invited to a wedding, sit down in the lowest place »; and of Ecclesiasticus, the eleventh: « But trust in God, and stay in thy place ». And the reason is given: Because care will make the greatest sins to cease. The translation of Symmachus has3: Because purity; whence the first to the Corinthians, the ninth: « I chastise my body and bring it into subjection, lest perhaps, when I have preached to others, I myself should become a castaway ».

It is expounded otherwise of the devil: If the spirit of him that hath power, that is, of the devil; Job, the last but one4: « There is no power upon earth that can be compared with him »; ascend upon thee, and this by tempting; Luke, the eleventh: « When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through places without water, seeking rest, and findeth not ». Leave not thy place, the place, namely, of penance; to the Ephesians, the fourth: « Give not place to the devil ». Because care will make the greatest sins to cease; the text of Origen5 has: salvation, which indeed is through the medicine of penance; of Ecclesiasticus, the eleventh: « The affliction of one hour maketh one forget the greatest delights », that is, a brief penance of a great sin.

(Vers. 5.). There is an evil that I have seen etc. Here the second is touched, namely the disordered prelacy of fools, both on account of a defect of knowledge and on account of a defect of life, since fools and the wicked are set over others, but the wise and those rich in good morals are pressed down. On account of which he says: There is an evil that I have seen under the sun, that is, in the present state of men, as it were by an error proceeding, not by error according to truth, but apparently by error, yet nevertheless according to a just judgement; from the face of the prince, namely of him from whom is all power, who by a just judgement sometimes gives wicked prelates; Osee, the thirteenth6: « I will give thee a king in my wrath, and will take him away in my indignation ».

(Vers. 6.). And he expresses what that evil is as regards the defect of knowledge: A fool set in high dignity; set, he says well, because there is nothing there but a false setting; the Psalm7: « Thou hast put it to them, thou hast cast them down when they were lifted up ». Or: set as a useless stone; whence in Zacharias, the eleventh, it is said to the foolish prelate: « O shepherd and idol! that forsaketh the flock, the sword upon his arm and upon his right eye; his arm shall quite wither away, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened »; and therefore in Proverbs, the twenty-sixth: « As he that casteth a stone into the heap of Mercury, so is he that giveth honour to a fool ». On the other hand: The rich sitting beneath; the rich, namely in good morals and knowledge and grace, of whom the first to the Corinthians, the first8: « In all things you are made rich in him, so that nothing is wanting to you in any grace »; and Isaias, the thirty-third: « Riches of salvation, wisdom and knowledge ».

(Vers. 7.). As regards the defect of life he says: I have seen servants upon horses; by servants he means sinners, of whom John, the eighth9: « Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin »; upon horses, he speaks in the plural to express pomp; Deuteronomy, the seventeenth: « When he is appointed, he shall not multiply horses to himself ». On the other hand: Princes walking as servants, those princes, namely, who rule themselves by a good life; Seneca: « If you rule yourself well, you will be a prince »; these he saw as servants, but in the future it will be the contrary; Luke, the fourteenth: « Every one that humbleth himself shall be exalted, and he that exalteth himself shall be humbled ».

Question.

It is asked here whether it is just that the wicked be set over the good. That it is so, seems:

p. 82 1. Because it is said to the Romans, the thirteenth1: There is no power but from God: therefore wicked princes do not have power except from God.

2. Likewise, John, the nineteenth2: Thou shouldst not have, says Christ to Pilate, any power against me, unless it were given thee from above. And Augustine expounds from above: that is, from God: therefore if Pilate was wicked and used power ill, then that the wicked are set over others is from God.

3. Likewise, the first of Peter, the second3: Be subject not only to the good and modest, but also to the froward; and he gives the reason: for conscience: therefore if it is just to be subject to them, since everything just is from God, this too will be from him.

4. Likewise, Job, the thirty-fourth4: Who maketh a hypocrite to reign for the sins of the people etc.: therefore etc.

On the contrary: 1. Osee, the eighth5: They have reigned, but not by me; they have been princes, and I knew not: therefore it seems that the prelacy of the wicked is not from God.

2. Likewise, servitude is a punishment inflicted for sin6, therefore it is rightly and justly inflicted on no one but the sinner: therefore from opposites, neither is lordship justly given except to the just. Therefore if lordship is given to the sinner, and servitude to the just, there is there a defect of order and of justice: therefore it is not from God.

3. Moreover, if the power of the wicked is just and from God, since nothing is from God but what is just; since no one ought to take away from anyone his right7: therefore no one ought to labour for the deposition of a wicked prelate: therefore whoever labours for it sins against this.

I respond: It must be said that the wicked or unjust prelate falls under a threefold difference. One is unjust in himself, yet enters justly and executes justly; and such a one can justly8 preside and does not sin in this, and it is just to be subject to such a one. There is also another, who enters unjustly and executes unjustly; and such a one cannot justly preside, nor ought a man to be subject to such a one. There is also another, who is unjust, but yet enters justly, but executes unjustly, since he afflicts the good and promotes the wicked; to such a one it is just to be subject in those things which pertain to justice; but in those things which are against God, a man ought not to be subject; and « since he deserves to lose his privilege who abuses the power granted to him9 », although he entered justly, yet it is just that he be removed.

As to what is objected, then, concerning the first part, whether it is just that the wicked preside: it must be said that for the wicked who rule well to preside is not an evil for the commonwealth; but for those who rule ill it is just to preside, not by their own justice, but by the divine, since he maketh him to reign for the sins of the people10. — And so the response to the first objections is clear, that the power of wicked men is from God.

1. As to what he objects to the contrary first, I say that he understands it as regards those who enter unlawfully and by their own authority, not by divine authority.

2. As to what he objects concerning order, I say that the punishment of sin remains even without sin, for exercise; so too I say of servitude in the good.

3. As to what he objects: if it is from God, then it is just that this man have such power: it must be said that by comparison with his own merits it is not just, nay rather unjust; in comparison with the merits of the wicked subjects it is just. And because for diverse causes it is lawful for us to will contraries, where the divine will is not plain; and we do not know which of these will please God more in the future: a man can justly labour that an unjust prelate be removed. — Moreover, he had such power from God, but the execution from himself; he had the power justly, but executes unjustly: and therefore so long as he has the power from God, he is to be obeyed; but because he executes unjustly, it is to be laboured that he may not have it. Thus that is clear11.

---

Apparatus Criticus
  1. 10
    Vers. 22. — Sequuntur III. Reg. 19, 11. et Ier. 4, 13. Post currus eius Vulgata addit velociores aquilis equi illius.
    V. 22. — There follow III Kings 19:11 and Jer. 4:13. After currus eius [his chariots] the Vulgate adds velociores aquilis equi illius [his horses are swifter than eagles].
  2. 11
    Vers. 19. — Seq. locus est I. Petr. 2, 18. et 19: Servi... dominis, non tantum bonis et modestis, sed etiam discolis etc.
    V. 19. — The following place is I Pet. 2:18 and 19: Servants... to your masters, not only to the good and modest, but also to the froward etc.
  3. 1
    Vers. 19. Pro custoditio Vulgata custodia. — De causali praedicatione cfr. tom. III. pag. 528, nota 5.
    V. 19. For custoditio [keeping] the Vulgate has custodia [keeping]. — On causal predication compare vol. III, p. 528, note 5.
  4. 2
    Vers. 8. et 10, ubi verba recumbe in novissimo loco. — Sequitur Eccli. 11, 22.
    Vv. 8 and 10, where are the words recumbe in novissimo loco [sit down in the lowest place]. — There follows Ecclus. 11:22.
  5. 3
    Hieron., Comment. in hunc locum: Symmachus verbum Hebraicum marphe, quod omnes ἴαμα, hoc est sanitatem vel curationem, similiter transtulerunt, interpretatus est ad sensum et ait: Si spiritus principis irruerit tibi, de loco tuo ne recedas; quia pudicitia comprimit peccata magna. — Subinde allegatur I. Cor. 9, 27, ubi pro praedicavero Vulgata praedicaverim.
    Jerome, Commentary on this place: Symmachus, the Hebrew word marphe, which all the others likewise translated ἴαμα, that is, sanitatem [health] or curationem [cure], interpreted according to the sense and said: If the spirit of the prince rush upon thee, do not withdraw from thy place; for purity represses great sins. — Then I Cor. 9:27 is adduced, where for praedicavero [I shall have preached] the Vulgate has praedicaverim [I have preached].
  6. 4
    Vers. 24. Vulgata quae comparetur ei. — Sequuntur Luc: 11, 24: Cum... de homine... et non inveniens dicit: Revertar etc.; Eph. 4, 27.
    V. 24. The Vulgate has quae comparetur ei [that is compared to him]. — There follow Luke 11:24: When... out of a man... and not finding, he saith: I will return etc.; Eph. 4:27.
  7. 5
    In sua Hexapla pro hoc loco affert ipse (praeter textum Hebraicum, Vulgatam et Symmachum) versionem, quam tribuit Septuaginta interpretibus: Quia medela sedabit peccata magna (ita ed. Migne, Patrol. Graeca tom. XVI. col. 1553), cum qua convenit Theodotion. Hieron. autem cum nostris editionibus versionem Septuaginta interpretum (quae apud Origenem ut textus Hebraicus refertur) ita exhibet: Quia sanitas requiescere facit peccata magna. — Seq. locus est Eccli. 11, 29. Vulgata omittit unius et ponit magnae pro maximae. — Haec expositio est ex Hieron. in hunc locum.
    In his Hexapla he himself brings forward for this place (besides the Hebrew text, the Vulgate and Symmachus) a version which he attributes to the Seventy translators: Because a remedy will allay great sins (so the Migne edition, Patrologia Graeca vol. XVI, col. 1553), with which Theodotion agrees. But Jerome, with our editions, presents the version of the Seventy translators (which in Origen is reported as the Hebrew text) thus: Because health makes great sins to rest. — The following place is Ecclus. 11:29. The Vulgate omits unius [of one] and puts magnae [great] for maximae [greatest]. — This exposition is from Jerome on this place.
  8. 6
    Vers. 11.
    V. 11.
  9. 7
    Psalm. 72; 18. — Sequuntur Zach. 11, 17. et Prov. 26, 8.
    Ps. 72; 18. — There follow Zach. 11:17 and Prov. 26:8.
  10. 8
    Vers. 5. et 7: ita ut nihil vobis etc. — Seq. locus est Isai. 33, 6.
    Vv. 5 and 7: so that nothing to you etc. — The following place is Isa. 33:6.
  11. 9
    Vers. 34. — Sequuntur Deut. 17, 16. (pro non C D E rex) et Luc. 14, 11. — Seneca, Epist. 37: Si vis omnia tibi subiicere, te subiice rationi; multos reges, si ratio te rexerit. Epist. 113. (alias 114.) circa finem: Imperare sibi maximum imperium est. — Aliquanto inferius pro vitam Vat. perperam viam.
    V. 34. — There follow Deut. 17:16 (for non [not] C D E have rex [the king]) and Luke 14:11. — Seneca, Letter 37: If you wish to subject all things to yourself, subject yourself to reason; you will rule many, if reason has ruled you. Letter 113 (otherwise 114), near the end: To command oneself is the greatest command. — A little below, for vitam [life] the Vatican edition wrongly has viam [way].
  12. 1
    Vers. 1.
    V. 1.
  13. 2
    Vers. 11. Expositio huius loci datur ab August., Enarrat. in Ps. 32. enarrat. 3. n. 12; in Ps. 103. serm. 3. n. 22. et lib. II. de Diversis Qq. ad Simplician. q. 1. n. 4. Cfr. II. Sent. lit. Magistri, d. XLIV. c. 1.
    V. 11. An exposition of this place is given by Augustine, Enarrations on the Psalms, Ps. 32, enarration 3, n. 12; on Ps. 103, sermon 3, n. 22; and On Various Questions to Simplician II, q. 1, n. 4. Compare II Sent., the text of the Master, d. XLIV, c. 1.
  14. 3
    Vers. 18: Servi, subditi estote in omni timore dominis, non tantum etc. Ratio redditur ibid, v. 19: Haec est enim gratia, si propter Dei conscientiam sustinet quis tristitias, patiens iniuste.
    V. 18: Servants, be subject in all fear to your masters, not only etc. The reason is given in the same place, v. 19: For this is grace, if for conscience towards God a man endure sorrows, suffering wrongfully.
  15. 4
    Vers. 30. Voci hypocritam Vulgata praefigit hominem.
    V. 30. Before the word hypocritam [a hypocrite] the Vulgate sets hominem [a man].
  16. 5
    Vers. 4.
    V. 4.
  17. 6
    Ambros., II. de Abraham c. 11. n. 79: Servitus peccato contrahitur. Cfr. tom. II. pag. 168, nota 3. et pag. 1008, nota 3, ubi loci ex August. allegati sunt.
    Ambrose, On Abraham II, c. 11, n. 79: Servitude is contracted by sin. Compare vol. II, p. 168, note 3, and p. 1008, note 3, where places from Augustine are adduced.
  18. 7
    Iustinian., I. Dig. tit. 6. De iis qui sui etc. leg. 2. dicit, quod non licet, « cuiquam hominum ius suum detrahi ».
    Justinian, Digest I, tit. 6, On those who are their own etc., law 2, says that it is not lawful « that any man's right be taken from him ».
  19. 8
    Vat. iusto, et deinde subiectos esse pro subesse.
    The Vatican edition has iusto [to the just], and then subiectos esse [to be subjected] for subesse [to be subject].
  20. 9
    Ut ait Innocent. III. in C. Tuarum (11.) et C. Ut privilegia (24.), X. de Privileg. et excess. privileg. (lib. V. Decret. Gregor. IX. tit 33.).
    As Innocent III says in the chapter Tuarum (11) and the chapter Ut privilegia (24), X, On privileges and the excesses of the privileged (book V of the Decretals of Gregory IX, tit. 33).
  21. 10
    Cfr. de hoc verbo Iob 34, 30. Gregor., XXV. Moral. c. 16. n. 34. seqq.
    On this word compare Job 34:30. Gregory, Morals XXV, c. 16, n. 34 ff.
  22. 11
    Vide II. Sent. d. 44. a. 2. et 3, et Alan. ab Insulis, II. contra Haereticos, c. 2-6; ubi sententiam Waldensium et posteriorum haereticorum, qui malorum superiorum nullam esse auctoritatem docebant, impugnat. — Superius pro quamdiu Vat. non bene quoniam.
    See II Sent. d. 44, a. 2 and 3, and Alan of Lille, Against the Heretics II, c. 2–6, where he attacks the opinion of the Waldenses and of later heretics, who taught that wicked superiors have no authority. — Above, for quamdiu [so long as] the Vatican edition, not well, has quoniam [since].
Cited by

2 further references address the article or printed page this question belongs to, rather than the question itself.

← Cap. 10, Vers. 1-3Cap. 10, Vers. 8-11→