Bonaventure

This file carries no numbered footnotes. Quaracchi restarts footnote numbering on every printed page, and page 1035 carries two separate registers — notes 1 and 2 of the Notae ad librum Sententiarum register (left footer) and note 1 of the Notae ad Commentarium register (right footer). None of the three is anchored in this chunk's body: the first two are anchored in the Master's letter above (`p2-littera`) and the third in the first question below (`p1-a1-q1`). See `## Notes` for the full split map.

## COMMENTARIUS IN DISTINCTIONEM L.

Pars I.

De statu damnatorum post iudicium.

Hic oritur quaestio ex praemissis ducens originem etc.

DIVISIO TEXTUS.

Supra egit Magister de statu Beatorum. In hac parte agit de statu damnatorum, primo post iudicium, secundo ante iudicium, ibi: Praeterea quaeri solet, si reproborum animae etc.

Prima pars habet duas. In prima determinat subversionem voluntatis; in secunda excaecationem rationis, ibi: Hic quaeri potest: quare illae tenebrae etc. Et utraque pars duas habet. In prima opponit, in secunda vero dissolvit.

TRACTATIO QUAESTIONUM.

Ad intelligentiam huius partis secundum duo, quae tangit Magister, duo principaliter quaeruntur.

Primo quaeritur de subversione voluntatis damnatorum.

Secundo de excaecatione rationis.

Circa primum quaeruntur tria.

Primo quaeritur, utrum damnati velint, se peccasse.

Secundo, utrum voluntate deliberativa damnati malint non esse quam esse sic.

Tertio, utrum damnati mallent, omnes esse damnatos, quam quosdam damnatos, quosdam beatos.

---

## COMMENTARY ON DISTINCTION L.

Part I.

On the state of the damned after the judgement.

Here a question arises drawing its origin from what has gone before, etc.

DIVISION OF THE TEXT.

Above the Master treated of the state of the Blessed. In this part he treats of the state of the damned: first, after the judgement; secondly, before the judgement, there: Besides, it is customary to ask whether the souls of the reprobate etc.

The first part has two [parts]. In the first he determines the subversion of the will; in the second, the blinding of the reason, there: Here it can be asked: why those darknesses etc. And each part has two [members]. In the first he raises the objection, in the second he in fact resolves it.

TREATMENT OF THE QUESTIONS.

For the understanding of this part, according to the two things which the Master touches upon, two things are principally asked.

First, inquiry is made concerning the subversion of the will of the damned.

Secondly, concerning the blinding of the reason.

Concerning the first, three things are asked.

First, it is asked whether the damned will that they had sinned.

Secondly, whether by a deliberative will the damned would rather not be, than be thus.

Thirdly, whether the damned would rather that all were damned, than that some were damned and some beatified.

---