← Back to Distinction 50

Dist. 50, Part 2, Art. 2, Q. 3

Book IV: On the Sacraments · Distinction 50

Textus Latinus
p. 1053

Quaestio III. Utrum vermis ille sit invariabilis.

Tertio et ultimo quaeritur, utrum vermis ille sit invariabilis. Et quod sic, videtur:

1. Quia culpa est invariabilis; et poena respicit culpam: ergo cum hic vermis sit poena, patet etc.

2. Item, ignis continue affligit et aequaliter: ergo similiter videtur, quod et vermis.

3. Item, omne variabile terminabile; sed vermis ille est interminabilis3: ergo etc.

Contra:

1. Vermis est ex recordatione peccati; sed non simul peccata recolent, cum non sint deiformes: ergo successive. Sed maiori poena4 maior debetur remorsus, et ubi hoc, ibi variabilitas: ergo etc.

2. Item, si vermis est, corrodit; sed quando aliquid diutius roditur, magis debilitatur et magis gravatur: ergo poena malorum semper crescit.

3. Item, si semper rodit; cum non sit infinitum bonum, quod adimit, ergo aliquando adimeret totum; sed hoc est impossibile: ergo etc.

Conclusio

Vermis ille non variatur.

Respondeo: Dicendum, quod iusto Dei iudicio, sicut dictum est supra5, fiet, ut mali simul omnia peccata memorentur, ut de omnibus continue torqueantur; et ideo vermis est pro omnibus et non intensior nunc quam ante.

Ad argumenta ad oppositum:

Ad 3. Ad illud quod obiicitur de ademptione6, dicendum, quod sicut egressus continuus alicuius ab aliquo est dupliciter: vel per innovationem secundum partem et partem, ut rivus a fonte, et motus a motore; aut eiusdem continuatione, ut ramus a radice, et radius a sole: sic ademptio continua vel per novi ablationem, sicut ignis comburit ligna; vel per eius continuationem, sicut ignis infernalis corpus, et dolor animum; et sic vermis continue rodit. Et illud melius supra7 patet de poena ignis; et per hunc modum intelligendum est de poena vermis8.

On the footnote numbering. Quaracchi restarts its footnote numbering on every printed page. This quaestio sits entirely within printed page 1053, whose register runs 1–11; the markers anchored in this quaestio are notes 3 through 8 of page 1053, and the labels below are qualified accordingly. Notes 1 and 2 of page 1053 anchor in the preceding quaestio (p2-a2-q2), and note 9 — together with its unnumbered continuation at the head of the right-hand footer — and notes 10 and 11 anchor in the following DUBIUM CIRCA LITTERAM MAGISTRI.

---

English Translation

Question III. Whether that worm is unchangeable.

Third and last it is asked whether that worm is unchangeable. And that it is, seems to be the case:

1. Because guilt is unchangeable; and punishment regards guilt: therefore, since this worm is a punishment, it is evident, etc.

2. Likewise, fire afflicts continuously and equally: therefore it likewise seems that the worm does also.

3. Likewise, everything changeable is terminable; but that worm is unterminable3: therefore, etc.

On the contrary:

1. The worm arises from the recollection of sin; but they will not recall their sins all at once, since they are not deiform: therefore successively. But to a greater punishment4 a greater remorse is owed, and where this is, there is changeableness: therefore, etc.

2. Likewise, if it is a worm, it gnaws; but when something is gnawed at for a longer time, it is more weakened and more burdened: therefore the punishment of the wicked always increases.

3. Likewise, if it always gnaws: since the good which it takes away is not infinite, therefore at some time it would take away the whole; but this is impossible: therefore, etc.

Conclusion

That worm does not vary.

I respond: It must be said that by the just judgement of God, as was said above5, it will come about that the wicked remember all their sins at once, so that they may be continuously tormented over all of them; and therefore the worm is for them all, and is not more intense now than before.

To the arguments on the contrary:

To 3. To that which is objected concerning the taking away6, it must be said that, just as the continuous going forth of something from something else is twofold — either by renewal part by part, as a stream from a spring, and motion from a mover; or by the continuation of the same thing, as a branch from a root, and a ray from the sun — so continuous taking away is either by the removal of something new, as fire burns up wood; or by the continuation of the same thing, as infernal fire [consumes] the body, and grief the mind; and in this way the worm continuously gnaws. And that is better made plain above7 concerning the punishment of fire; and in this manner it is to be understood concerning the punishment of the worm8.

---

Apparatus Criticus
  1. 3
    Isai. 66, 24: Vermis eorum non morietur. Cfr. Marc. 9, 43. 45. 47.
    Isaiah 66:24: Their worm shall not die. Cf. Mark 9:43, 45, 47.
  2. 4
    Ita codd. A B C G L V (post maiori supple: peccato); cod. E pro poena bene substituit culpae; alii et edd. non apte poenae.
    Thus codices A B C G L V (after maiori supply: peccato); codex E rightly substitutes culpae for poena; the others and the editions have, not aptly, poenae.
  3. 5
    Dist. 43. a. 3. q. 3.
    Distinction 43, article 3, question 3.
  4. 6
    Codd. et ed. 1 intensione, vel intentione. Inferius ante comburit Vat. addit consumit et.
    The codices and edition 1 read intensione, or intentione. Below, before comburit, the Vatican edition adds consumit et.
  5. 7
    Dist. 44. p. II. a. 3. q. 1. ad 2. et q. 2. ad 7.
    Distinction 44, part II, article 3, question 1, to the second; and question 2, to the seventh.
  6. 8
    Vide scholion ad 1. huius articuli quaest.
    See the scholion on question 1 of this article. ---
Cited by

2 places in the Opera Omnia citethis question. Derived from Quaracchi’s own apparatus, never tagged by hand.

2 further references address the article or printed page this question belongs to, rather than the question itself.

Dist. 50, Part 2, Art. 2, Q. 2Dist. 50, Part 2, Dubia